Team LiB
Previous Section Next Section

Foundation Summary

The "Foundation Summary" is a collection of tables and figures that provide a convenient review of many key concepts in this chapter. For those of you already comfortable with the topics in this chapter, this summary can help you recall a few details. For those of you who just read this chapter, this review can help solidify some key facts. For any of you doing your final preparation before the exam, these tables and figures are a convenient way to review the day before the exam.

A single voice packet consists of the voice payload, an RTP header, a UDP header, an IP header, and a Layer 2 header, as shown in Figure 10-7.

Figure 10-7. Voice Packet

Layer 2

IP

UDP

RTP

Voice Payload

Variable Size Based on Layer 2 Protocol

20 Bytes

8 Bytes

12 Bytes

Variable Size Based on Codec Selection and the ms of Speech Included


Table 10-21 lists the common G.711 and G.729 rates without including Layer 2 overhead.

Table 10-21. Codec Selection

Codec

Speech Samples Per Packet

Voice Payload

Packets Per Second

Total Bandwidth Per Call

G.711

20 ms

160 bytes

50 pps

80 kbps

G.711

30 ms

240 bytes

33 pps

74 kbps

G.729

20 ms

20 bytes

50 pps

24 kbps

G.729

30 ms

30 bytes

33 pps

19 kbps


Table 10-22 lists the common G.711 and G.729 rates including Layer 2 overhead.

Table 10-22. Layer 2 Headers

Codec

802.1Q Ethernet (32 Bytes @ Layer 2)

MLP (13 Bytes @ Layer 2)

Frame Relay (8 Bytes @ Layer 2)

ATM (Variable Bytes @ Layer 2 Due to Cell Padding)

G.711 @ 50 pps

93 kbps

86 kbps

84 kbps

106 kbps

G.711 @ 33 pps

83 kbps

78 kbps

77 kbps

84 kbps

G729a @ 50 pps

37 kbps

30 kbps

28 kbps

43 kbps

G729a @ 33 pps

27 kbps

22 kbps

21 kbps

28 kbps


Table 10-23 lists the delay, jitter, and packet-loss requirements for transporting voice traffic.

Table 10-23. Voice Delay, Jitter, and Packet Loss

Delay

< or = 150 ms

Jitter

< or = 30 ms

Packet Loss

< 1 percent


Table 10-24 compares the QoS requirements of voice traffic with other types of traffic.

Table 10-24. Voice Traffic Requirements
 

Voice

Video

Mission-Critical/Transactional Data

Bulk Data/Best-Effort Data

Bandwidth Requirements

Low to Moderate

Moderate

Low to Moderate

Moderate to High

Drop Sensitivity

High

High

Moderate to High

Low

Delay Sensitivity

High

High

Low to Moderate

Low

Jitter Sensitivity

High

High

Low to Moderate

Low

Smooth or Bursty

Smooth

Bursty

Both

Both

Benign or Greedy

Benign

Greedy

Both

Both


Table 10-25 lists the delay, jitter, and packet-loss requirements for transporting video traffic.

Table 10-25. Video Delay, Jitter, and Packet Loss

Delay

< or = 150 ms

Jitter

< or = 30 ms

Packet Loss

< 1 percent

Bandwidth Fluctuation

20 percent


Table 10-26 lists the Cisco best practices for classification and marking of DSCP and CoS values for each traffic type.

Table 10-26. Classification and Marking Best Practices

Application or Protocol

DSCP Marking

DSCP Decimal Value

CoS Value

Voice traffic

EF

46

5

Bulk transfer traffic

Web traffic, FTP traffic, large data-transfer applications, and so on

AF11

AF12

AF13

10

1

Transactional applications

Database access, interactive traffic, and so on

AF21

AF22

AF23

18

2

Mission-critical applications

Core business traffic

AF31

AF32

AF33

25

3

Interactive video traffic

AF41

AF42

AF43

34

4

IP routing

BGP, OSPF, and so on

Class 6 (CS6)

48

6

Streaming video

Class 4 (CS4)

32

4

Voice and video signaling traffic

SIP, H.323, and so on

AF31/Class 3 (CS3)

26/24

3

Network management traffic

SNMP

Class 2 (CS2)

16

2

Scavenger traffic

Class 1 (CS1)

8

1

Unspecified or unclassified traffic

Best Effort or class 0 (CSO)

0

0


Table 10-27 lists the congestion management best practices. Remember that the percentage of bandwidth allocated depends upon the applications on your network. In many cases, all the listed classes will not be needed. This allows for the bandwidth assigned to the unnecessary class to be allocated to necessary classes.

Table 10-27. Congestion Management Best Practices

Application or Protocol

DSCP Marking

Queue Used

Percentage of Queue

Voice traffic

EF

LLQ

The combination of voice and video traffic in LLQ should not use more than 33 percent of the total available link bandwidth (e.g., 20 percent of total bandwidth).

Bulk transfer traffic

Web traffic, FTP traffic, large data-transfer applications, and so on

AF11

AF12

AF13

CBWFQ

This class will receive a moderate amount of the remaining bandwidth after LLQ has beenserviced (e.g., 15 percent of remaining bandwidth).

Transactional applications

Database access, interactive traffic, and so on

AF21

AF22

AF23

CBWFQ

This class will receive a small amount of the remaining bandwidth after LLQ has been serviced (e.g., 5 percent of remaining bandwidth).

Mission-critical applications

Core business traffic

AF31

AF32

AF33

CBWFQ

This class will receive more of the remaining bandwidth after LLQ has been serviced (e.g., 25 percent of remaining bandwidth).

Interactive video traffic

AF41

AF42

AF43

LLQ

The combination of voice and video traffic in LLQ should not use more than 33 percent of the total available link bandwidth).

IP routing

BGP, OSPF, and so on

Class 6 (CS6)

CBWFQ

This class will receive a moderate amount of the remaining bandwidth after LLQ has been serviced (e.g., 10 percent of remaining bandwidth).

Streaming video

Class 4 (CS4)

CBWFQ

This class will receive a moderate amount of the remaining bandwidth after LLQ has been serviced (e.g., 10 percent of remaining bandwidth).

Voice and video signaling traffic

SIP, H.323, and so on

AF31/Class 3 (CS3)

CBWFQ

This class will receive a small amount of the remaining bandwidth after LLQ has been serviced (e.g., 5 percent of remaining bandwidth).

Network management traffic

SNMP

Class 2 (CS2)

CBWFQ

This class will receive a small amount of the remaining bandwidth after LLQ has been serviced (e.g., 5 percent of remaining bandwidth).

Scavenger traffic

Class 1 (CS1)

CBWFQ

If used, this class will receive less than besteffort treatment. Packets in this class will be transmitted only if there are no other packets to transmit.

Unspecified or unclassified traffic

Best Effort or class 0 (CS0)

CBWFQ

This class will receive no guarantees. Some percentage of bandwidth can be specified that will be used by this class if all other classes have been transmitted (e.g., 5 percent of remaining bandwidth).


Table 10-28 lists the best practices for congestion avoidance.

Table 10-28. Congestion Avoidance Best Practices

Application or Protocol

DSCP Marking

WRED Policy

Voice traffic

EF

WRED not applied.

Bulk transfer traffic

Web traffic, FTP traffic, large data-transfer applications, and so on

AF11

AF12

AF13

DSCP-based

The default minimum and maximum thresholds will be used for this class of traffic if WRED is enabled.

Transactional applications

Database access, interactive traffic, and so on

AF21

AF22

AF23

DSCP-based

The default minimum and maximum thresholds will be used for this class of traffic if WRED is enabled.

Mission-critical applications

Core business traffic

AF31

AF32

AF33

DSCP-based

The default minimum and maximum thresholds will be used for this class of traffic if WRED is enabled.

Interactive video traffic

AF41

AF42

AF43

DSCP-based

The default minimum and maximum thresholds will be used for AF42 and AF43 if WRED is enabled. Interactive video, marked AF41, should use LLQ, and, therefore, WRED should not be applied.

IP routing

BGP, OSPF, and so on

Class 6 (CS6)

DSCP-based

The default minimum and maximum thresholds will be used for this class of traffic.

Streaming video

Class 4 (CS4)

DSCP-based

The default minimum and maximum thresholds will be used for this class of traffic if WRED is enabled.

Voice and video signaling traffic

SIP, H.323, and so on

AF31/Class 3 (CS3)

DSCP-based

A high minimum threshold should be set for this class of traffic if WRED is enabled.

Network management traffic

SNMP

Class 2 (CS2)

DSCP-based

The default minimum and maximum thresholds will be used for this class of traffic if WRED is enabled.

Scavenger traffic

Class 1 (CS1)

DSCP-based

A low minimum threshold should be set for this class of traffic if WRED is enabled.

Unspecified or unclassified traffic

Best Effort or class 0 (CS0)

DSCP-based

The default minimum and maximum thresholds will be used for this class of traffic if WRED is enabled.


Table 10-29 lists the QoS components that need to be configured in the access layer and distribution layer of the campus LAN.

Table 10-29. QoS Components of the Access and Distribution Layers

QoS Component

Component Function

Trust boundaries

Determines the devices to be trusted. Establishes the trust boundary as close to the source as possible.

Access layer function.

Classification and marking

Identifies and marks traffic with desired DSCP/CoS values. Performs as close to the source as possible.

Modifies CoS-to-DSCP map.

Access layer function.

Congestion management

Schedules each class of traffic with the desired CoS.

Access and distribution layer function.

Policing

Limits unwanted or excessive traffic.

Access and distribution layer function.


Table 10-30 lists the QoS components required on the CE router.

Table 10-30. QoS Components of the CE Router

QoS Component

Component Function Managed Enterprise WAN Edge

Component Function Unmanaged Enterprise WAN Edge

SLA

Defines the supported classes of traffic and the level of service each class will receive.

Enforced on the CE router

Defines the supported classes of traffic and the level of service each class will receive.

Enforced on the PE router.

Trust boundaries

Established on the CE router by the service provider.

The service provider can then trust packets received from the CE, which removes the need for an inbound policy on the PE router.

Established on the CE router by the enterprise administrator.

The service provider may not trust packets received from the CE and may remark traffic at the PE based upon the SLA.

Classification and marking

Traffic will be reclassified and marked on the CE based upon the classes offered in the SLA.

The service provider can then trust markings received from the CE, which removes the need for an inbound policy on the PE router.

Traffic may be reclassified and marked on the CE based upon the classes offered in the SLA.

The service provider may not trust packets received from the CE and may remark traffic at the PE based upon the SLA.

Congestion management

LLQ/CBWFQ queuing will be configured on the CE in accordance with the SLA.

Traffic shaping, LFI, and cRTP may be configured depending upon the link type and speed.

LLQ/CBWFQ queuing will be configured on the CE in accordance with the SLA.

Traffic shaping, LFI, and cRTP may be configured depending upon the link type and speed.

Congestion avoidance

WRED may be used to randomly drop best-effort traffic.

WRED may be used to randomly drop besteffort traffic.

Policing

Policing may be required on the CE router.

The service provider can then trust the traffic rate received from the CE, which removes the need for an inbound policy on the PE router.

Policing will be required on the PE router.

The service provider will reclassify or drop traffic that exceeds the limit specified in the SLA.


Table 10-31 lists the QoS components required on the PE router.

Table 10-31. QoS Components of the PE Router

QoS Component

Component Function Managed Enterprise WAN Edge

Component Function Unmanaged Enterprise WAN Edge

SLA

Defines the supported classes of traffic and the level of service each class will receive.

Enforced on the CE router

Defines the supported classes of traffic and the level of service each class will receive.

Enforced on the PE router.

Trust boundaries

Established on the CE router by the service provider.

The service provider can then trust packets received from the CE router, which removes the need for an inbound policy on the PE router.

The service provider may not trust packets received from the CE router and may remark traffic at the PE based upon the SLA.

Classification and marking

Traffic will be reclassified and remarked on the CE router based upon the classes offered in the SLA.

The service provider can then trust markings received from the CE router, which removes the need for an inbound policy on the PE router.

Traffic may be reclassified and remarked on the PE based upon the classes offered in the SLA.

Congestion management

LLQ/CBWFQ queuing will be configured in accordance with the SLA.

Traffic shaping, LFI, and cRTP may be configured depending upon the link type and speed.

LLQ/CBWFQ queuing will be configured in accordance with the SLA.

Traffic shaping, LFI, and cRTP may be configured depending upon the link type and speed.

Congestion avoidance

WRED may be used to randomly drop best-effort traffic.

WRED may be used to randomly drop besteffort traffic.

Policing

Policing may be required on the CE router.

The service provider can then trust the traffic rate received from the CE, which removes the need for an inbound policy on the PE router.

Policing will be required on the PE router.

The service provider will reclassify or drop traffic that exceeds the limit specified in the SLA.


For Further Reading

This book attempts to cover the breadth and depth of QoS as covered on the QOS exam (643-642); however, you might want to read more about topics in this chapter.

For more on the topics in this chapter:

For design-related guidance:

    Team LiB
    Previous Section Next Section